|
KMID : 0377219870120000129
|
|
Medical Journal of Chosun Univercity
1987 Volume.12 No. 0 p.129 ~ p.155
|
|
|
A STUDY ON THE LEVEL OF BASIC ROLE PERFORMANCE & PREFERENCE OF THE AGED WOMEN IN THE FAMILY
|
|
박명희/Park, Myung Hee
김란/Kim, Ran
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of basic role performance & preference of the aged women in the family.
The data for this study was collected from July 1 to July 18, 1992.
The subjects were collected by interview from 114 women over 65years old residing in kwang-Ju city.
The instrument used for this study were the level of basic role performance & preference of the aged women in the family developed by Cho-kab Chul.
Analysis of data was done by S.P.S.S. program using percentage t-test, one-way ANOVA.
The result of the study as follows:
1. There was significant difference between the level of role performance and that of preference.
(house hold head role (t=0.02, p<0.01), educator role(t=-7.67, p<0.001), service role(t=2.84, p<0.05)
2. The result of comparison between general characteristics and the level of role performance & preference of the aged women in the family expressed a significant difference
1) The result of comparison between the age and the level of role performance, (house hold head role (F=9.245, p<0.001), educator role (F=12.085, p<0.001), service role(F=6.977, p<0.001))
The result of comparison between the age and the level of role preference.(house hold head role (F=2.005, p<0.05) educator role (F=7.497, p<0.001) service role (F=6.081, p<0.001))
2) The result of comparison between educational level and the level of performance. (house hold head role (F=7.582, p<0.001) educator role (F=5.020, p<0.001) service role (F=2.054, p<0.05))
The result of comparison between and educational level and the level of preference. (house hold head role (F=1.217, p<0.05) educator role (F=0.378, p<0.05) serevice role (F=0.652, p<0.05))
3) The result of comparison between attending voluntary work and the level of performace.(house hold head role (F=1.582, p<0.05) educator role (F=1.745, p<0.001) service role (F=12.226, p<0.05))
The result of comparison between attending voluntary work and the level of preference (house hold head role (F=1.654, p<0.05) educator role (F=0.758, p<0.05) service role (F=9.436, p<0.05))
4) The result of comparison between having husband and the level of performance (house hold head role (F=17.987, p<0.001) educator role (F=21.425, p<0.001) service role (F=10.365, p<0.05))
The result of comparison between having husband and the level of preference (house hold head role (F=0.557, p<0.05) educator role (F=5.200, p<0.05) service role (F=4.666, p<0.05))
5) The result of comparison between having chilldren (not yet married) and the level of performance (house hold head role (F=8.865, p<0.05) educator role (F=1.925, p<0.05) service role (F=1.978, p<0.05)) The result of comparison between having Chilldren (not yet married) and the level of preference (house hold head role (F=2.944, p<0.05) educator role (F=0.192, p<0.05)
service role (F=0.138, p<0.05)) 6) The result of comparison between respondent’s order of daughter in-low and the level of performance (house hold head role (F=0.178, p<0.05) educator role (F=0.013, p<0.05) service role (F=5.345, p<0.05))
The result of comparison between respondent’s order of daughter in-low and the level of preference (house hold head role (F=0.856, p<0.05) educator role (F=0.015, p<0.05) service role (F=1.403, p<0.05))
7) The result of comparison between the number of people they lived together and the level of performance (house hold head role (F=1.677, p<0.05) educator role (F=3.178, p<0.05)
service role (F=3.319, p<0.05))
The result of comparison between the number of people they live together and the level of preference
(house hold head role (F=1.333, p<0.05) educator role (F=1.101, p<0.05) service role (F=0.822, p<0.05)) 8) the result of comparison between the people they lived together and the level of role performance (house hold head role (F=10.389, p<0.05) educator role (F=2.832, p<0.05)
service role (F=5.584, p<0.001)) The result of comparison between the people they live together and the level of role preference. (house hold head role (F=7.817, p<0.001) educator role (F=3.261, p<0.05)
service role (F=0.661, p<0.05))
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|
|